Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Pre-Austronesian population | Present: Clear evidence of human occupation prior to Austronesian settlement | Bellwood 1995: 109 |
Christian influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence but in a region where contact is likely (No evidence of Christian influence on supernatural belief, but culture is known to have had (or is likely to have had) contact with Christian societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | Forth 1981: 7 |
Hindu / Buddhist influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence but in a region where contact is likely (No evidence of Hindu / Buddhist influence on supernatural belief, but culture is likely to have had contact with Hindu or Buddhist societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | Forth 1981: 7, 76-77 |
(Low) contact with other societies (SCCS v 787) | Frequent, through trade, warfare, travel, etc. (e.g. yearly or most years) | Forth 1981: 7-8 |
Islamic influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence but in a region where contact is likely (No evidence of Islamic influence on supernatural belief, but culture is known to have had (or is likely to have had) contact with Islamic societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | Forth 1981: 7-8 |
Distance to closest landmass inhabited by a different culture (km) | 0 | Forth 1981: 3 |
Distance to nearest continent (km) | 694 | Calculator 2014; Forth 1981: 4 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Longitude of culture’s location (°) | 120.3 | 2014; Forth 1981: 4 |
Latitude of culture’s location (°) | -9.9 | 2014; Forth 1981: 4 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Number of islands inhabited by culture | One | Forth 1981: 3 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Island type (island with largest culture population or largest island if unknown) | Tectonic (an oceanic island formed by tectonic uplift, e.g. Macquarie Island) | Vel 2008: 24 |
Maximum elevation (meters) | 1220 | 2016 |
Island Size (km²) | 11153 | 2016; Forth 1981: 3 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Estimate of culture population size at relevant time focus | 60000 | Forth 1981: 13; Gooszen 1999: 225 |
Importance of Matrilateral descent (V.2) | Low (Matrilateral descent plays little or no role in determining social status and / or group membership.) | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 76 |
Importance of Patrilateral descent (V.2) | High (Patrilateral descent plays an important role in determining social status and / or group membership, and is more important than any other form of descent.) | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 76 |
Polygamy (SCCS 861) | Limited polygyny (< 20% of married males) | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 75-76 |
Estimated population of largest political community | 1,000-9,999 | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 74-75; Forth 1981: 14 |
Political Authority | Supralocal (encompasses multiple local groups) | Forth 1981: 45-46, 221-222, 225 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
(No) conflict (social or political) within the local community (SCCS v 767) | Low (Conflict seldom occurs, and is almost never violent.) | Forth 1981: 214-281, 280 |
(No) internal warfare (between communities of the same society) (SCCS v 773) | Frequent, occurring at least yearly | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 74-77; Forth 1981: 7 |
(No) external warfare (with other societies) (SCCS v 774) | Frequent, occurring at least yearly | Forth 1981: 7-8 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Metalworking | Present | Forth 1981: 16 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Animal husbandry as a source of food | Medium | Forth 1981: 15 |
Land-based hunting performed by individuals | Minor | Forth 1981: 16 |
Land-based gathering | Minor | Forth 1981: 14-17, 15 |
Land-based hunting performed by one or more groups | Minor | Forth 1981: 16 |
Agriculture / Horticulture | Principal (more important than any other source of food) | Forth 1981: 14 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Water-based gathering | Major | Forth 1981: 15-16 |
Fishing and water-based hunting performed by one or more groups | Major | Forth 1981: 15-16 |
Fishing and water-based hunting performed by individuals | Major | Forth 1981: 15-16 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Trade / wage labour as a source of food | Medium | Forth 1981: 14-17 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Was a foreign religion adopted through a top-down (those high in the social hierarchy converted first, followed by the general population) or a bottom-up (the general population converted first, followed by those high in the social hierarchy) process? | Primarily a top-down process, although inroads had already been made with the general population. | |
Use of force in conversion | Medium (e.g force was threatened or implied during the conversion process; some communities agreed to conversion but others were forced to convert) | Keane 2007: 152-153 |
Adoption of a world religion | Present and predominant (At one time or another during the post-contact period, at least 75% of the indigenous population practiced a world religion.) | Keane 2007: 154; Vel 2005: 91 |
Resident missionary involvement in conversion process | Present, and from non-Austronesian societies (Resident foreign missionaries, at least one of whom was from a non-Austronesian society, played an important role in the conversion process.) | Forth 1981: 9 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Syncretic religious movements | Absent | Keane 2007 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Replacement-level immigration | Low (Replacement-level immigration occurred. The immigrant culture had a population size more than 10% of that of the indigenous culture at one time or another, but this figure never exceeded 50%.) | |
Language shift | Medium (The indigenous language remained an important means of communication for the duration of the post-contact period, but at one time or another the indigenous population used a non-indigenous language to roughly the same extent.) | |
Foreign education systems | High (At one time or another during the post-contact period over 75% of children received some at least a basic non-indigenous education.) | |
Foreign government systems | Present, and of high importance (At one time or another during the post-contact period the culture was subject to a foreign government system that controlled most important decisions.) | Vel 2005: 83; Hoskins 1996: 239; Hoskins 2000: 612 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Changes in means of subsistence | Medium (Principal and major means of subsistence have changed from their indigenous states (e.g. through gain or loss of major and / or principal means of subsistence), but at least one of the major or principal means of subsistance has persisted.) | Vel 2005: 82-83 |
Exportation of goods to other cultures | Present and substantial (At one time or another during the post-contact period, exports were a primary focus of economic activity for over 10% of the population.) | 2016 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Vehicles and roads | Present and widely used (At one time or another during the post-contact period, motor vehicles were used by a substantial proportion of the population.) | |
Air travel | Present, local only (At no time during the post-contact period did most members of the culture have access to international air travel, but at one time or another most members of the culture had access to domestic air travel.) | 2016 |
Sea port | Present (At one time or another during the post-contact period most members of the culture had access to a sea port.) | 2016 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Loss of autonomy during postcontact period | High (On at least one occasion during the post-contact period, the culture came under the political dominance of a foreign power, and this event resulted in considerable loss of autonomy.) | Vel 2005: 83; Hoskins 1996: 239; Hoskins 2000: 612 |
Nature of loss of autonomy – voluntary vs. forced | Largely involuntary (autonomy was lost largely as a result of external force) | Hoskins 1996: 217; Hoskins 2000: 612 |