Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Pre-Austronesian population | Present: Clear evidence of human occupation prior to Austronesian settlement | Bellwood 1995: 109 |
Christian influence on supernatural belief | Evidence of influence (Evidence of Christian influence on supernatural belief.) | Wallace 2013: 9, 109 |
Hindu / Buddhist influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence and not in region of known contact (No evidence of Hindu / Buddhist influence on supernatural belief, and culture is unlikely to have had contact with Hindu or Buddhist societies at or prior to to the time focus in question.) | Cribb 2000: Map 2.21; Wallace 2013: 8-10, 92-104 |
(Low) contact with other societies (SCCS v 787) | Frequent, through trade, warfare, travel, etc. (e.g. yearly or most years) | Wallace 2013: 27, 38-39 |
Islamic influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence and not in region of known contact (No evidence of Islamic influence on supernatural belief, and culture is unlikely to have had contact with Islamic societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | Cribb 2000: 2.23; Wallace 2013: 8-10, 92-104 |
Distance to closest landmass inhabited by a different culture (km) | 0 | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 100 |
Distance to nearest continent (km) | 812.3 | Wallace 2013: 12-13 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Longitude of culture’s location (°) | 121.5 | 2014; Wallace 2013: 12-13 |
Latitude of culture’s location (°) | 17.2 | 2014; Wallace 2013: 12-13 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Number of islands inhabited by culture | One | Wallace 2013: 7-8 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Island type (island with largest culture population or largest island if unknown) | Volcanic high island (an oceanic island of volcanic origin, e.g. Hawaii) | Yumul et al. 2009: 732-733 |
Maximum elevation (meters) | 2930 | Luzon 2019 |
Island Size (km²) | 104688 | Luzon 2019 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Estimate of culture population size at relevant time focus | 2500 | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101 |
Importance of Matrilateral descent (V.2) | Low (Matrilateral descent plays little or no role in determining social status and / or group membership.) | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 101, 102 |
Importance of Patrilateral descent (V.2) | Low (Patrilateral descent plays little or no role in determining social status and / or group membership.) | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 101, 102 |
Polygamy (SCCS 861) | Monogamy prescribed | Wallace 1969: 183 |
Marital residence (SCCS 69) | Neolocal - separate from kin | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101 |
Kinship system (if applicable) | Eskimo | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101-102 |
Estimated population of largest political community | 99 or fewer | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101, 102 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
(No) internal warfare (between communities of the same society) (SCCS v 773) | Occasional, at least every generation | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 102; Wallace 2013: 80-81 |
(No) external warfare (with other societies) (SCCS v 774) | Occasional, at least every generation | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 102; Wallace 2013: 80-81 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Animal husbandry as a source of food | Minor | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101 |
Land-based hunting performed by individuals | Minor | Wallace 1951: 55-56 |
Land-based gathering | Minor | Wallace 2013: 55-56 |
Land-based hunting performed by one or more groups | Minor | Wallace 2013: 55-56 |
Agriculture / Horticulture | Principal (more important than any other source of food) | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101; Wallace 2013: 54-56 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Water-based gathering | Medium | Wallace 2013: 55-56 |
Fishing and water-based hunting performed by one or more groups | Medium | Wallace 2013: 55 |
Fishing and water-based hunting performed by individuals | Medium | Wallace 2013: 55-56 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Trade / wage labour as a source of food | Major | Lebar (eds.) 1975: 101; Wallace 2013: 55-56 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Was a foreign religion adopted through a top-down (those high in the social hierarchy converted first, followed by the general population) or a bottom-up (the general population converted first, followed by those high in the social hierarchy) process? | Mixed / Neither (e.g. Both high-status individuals and the general population converted at the same time, or the religion was adopted through a mixture of top-down and bottom-up processes.) | Wallace 2013: 11-112 |
Use of force in conversion | Low (most communities adopted the new religion either voluntarily or due to pressure from other communities of the same culture) | Wallace 2013: 112 |
Adoption of a world religion | Present and predominant (At one time or another during the post-contact period, at least 75% of the indigenous population practiced a world religion.) | Wallace 2013: 8 |
Resident missionary involvement in conversion process | Present, and from Austronesian societies only (Resident foreign missionaries played an important role in the conversion process, but these missionaries were from other Austronesian societies only.) | Wallace 2013: 111 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Syncretic religious movements | Absent | Wallace 2013: 109-115, 110 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Language shift | Medium (The indigenous language remained an important means of communication for the duration of the post-contact period, but at one time or another the indigenous population used a non-indigenous language to roughly the same extent.) | Wallace 2013: 70 |
Foreign education systems | High (At one time or another during the post-contact period over 75% of children received some at least a basic non-indigenous education.) | Wallace 2013: 70 |
Foreign government systems | Present, and of high importance (At one time or another during the post-contact period the culture was subject to a foreign government system that controlled most important decisions.) | Wallace 2013: 48-49, 82-83 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Changes in means of subsistence | Medium (Principal and major means of subsistence have changed from their indigenous states (e.g. through gain or loss of major and / or principal means of subsistence), but at least one of the major or principal means of subsistance has persisted.) | Wallace 2013: 55-56, 60-62 |
Exportation of goods to other cultures | Present and substantial (At one time or another during the post-contact period, exports were a primary focus of economic activity for over 10% of the population.) | Wallace 2013: 55-56 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Vehicles and roads | Present and widely used (At one time or another during the post-contact period, motor vehicles were used by a substantial proportion of the population.) | Wallace 2013: 48-49 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Loss of autonomy during postcontact period | Medium (The culture maintained some political autonomy throughout the post-contact period, but on at least one occasion during the post-contact period the culture entered into a political relationship with a foreign power that involved some loss of autonomy.) | Wallace 2013: 48-49, 82-83 |
Nature of loss of autonomy – voluntary vs. forced | Largely voluntary (Autonomy was ceded either voluntarily or as a result of pressure from other members of the same culture, without the threat of external force being necessary.) | Wallace 2013: 48-49, 82-83 |