Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Pre-Austronesian population | Present: Clear evidence of human occupation prior to Austronesian settlement | Bellwood 1995: 109 |
Christian influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence but in a region where contact is likely (No evidence of Christian influence on supernatural belief, but culture is known to have had (or is likely to have had) contact with Christian societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | |
Hindu / Buddhist influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence but in a region where contact is likely (No evidence of Hindu / Buddhist influence on supernatural belief, but culture is likely to have had contact with Hindu or Buddhist societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | Cribb 2000: Map 2.21; Metcalf 1982 |
(Low) contact with other societies (SCCS v 787) | Frequent, through trade, warfare, travel, etc. (e.g. yearly or most years) | Metcalf 1976 |
Islamic influence on supernatural belief | No evidence of influence but in a region where contact is likely (No evidence of Islamic influence on supernatural belief, but culture is known to have had (or is likely to have had) contact with Islamic societies at or prior to the time focus in question.) | Cribb 2000: Map 2.23; Metcalf 1982 |
Distance to closest landmass inhabited by a different culture (km) | 0 | Metcalf 1976: 86, 93-97 |
Distance to nearest continent (km) | 1086.5 | Calculator 2014; Ethnologue 2014 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Longitude of culture’s location (°) | 114.5 | 2014: 86; Metcalf 1976 |
Latitude of culture’s location (°) | 3.8 | 2014; Metcalf 1976 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Number of islands inhabited by culture | One | Metcalf 1976: 86 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Island type (island with largest culture population or largest island if unknown) | Continental island (an island situated on a continental shelf, e.g. Taiwan) | Shelf 2016 |
Maximum elevation (meters) | 4101 | Borneo 2019 |
Island Size (km²) | 755000 | Borneo 2019 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Estimate of culture population size at relevant time focus | 1600 | Metcalf 1976: 88 |
Importance of Matrilateral descent (V.2) | Medium (Matrilateral descent plays an important role in determining social status and / or group membership, but is not the most important form of descent.) | Huntington and Metcalf 1979: 133; Metcalf 1982: 16 |
Importance of Patrilateral descent (V.2) | Medium (Patrilateral descent plays an important role in determining social status and / or group membership, but is not the most important form of descent.) | Huntington and Metcalf 1979: 133; Metcalf 1982: 16 |
Polygamy (SCCS 861) | Full polygyny (20% or more of married males) | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 170 |
Marital residence (SCCS 69) | Ambilocal - with either wife's or husband's kin | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 1972 |
Kinship system (if applicable) | Eskimo | Lebar (eds.) 1972: 170-171 |
Estimated population of largest political community | 100-999 | Metcalf 1976: 88; Huntington and Metcalf 1979: 133 |
Political Authority | Absent, or restricted to a group no larger than the household | Huntington and Metcalf 1979; Hughes 1937 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
(No) conflict (social or political) within the local community (SCCS v 767) | Low (Conflict seldom occurs, and is almost never violent.) | Metcalf 1982: 13-19 |
(No) internal warfare (between communities of the same society) (SCCS v 773) | Rare or never | Metcalf 1976; Metcalfe 1987: 250-251 |
(No) external warfare (with other societies) (SCCS v 774) | Rare or never | Metcalf 1976; Metcalfe 1987: 250-251 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Animal husbandry as a source of food | Medium | Metcalf 1982: 16 |
Land-based hunting performed by individuals | Major | Metcalf 1982: 13 |
Land-based gathering | Medium | Metcalf 1982: 13-16 |
Land-based hunting performed by one or more groups | Major | Metcalf 1982: 13 |
Agriculture / Horticulture | Principal (more important than any other source of food) | Metcalf 1982: 13 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Water-based gathering | Absent | Metcalf 1982: 13-16 |
Fishing and water-based hunting performed by one or more groups | Medium | Metcalf 1982: 16 |
Fishing and water-based hunting performed by individuals | Medium | Metcalf 1982: 16 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Trade / wage labour as a source of food | Absent | Metcalf 1982: 15-16 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Was a foreign religion adopted through a top-down (those high in the social hierarchy converted first, followed by the general population) or a bottom-up (the general population converted first, followed by those high in the social hierarchy) process? | Mixed / Neither (e.g. Both high-status individuals and the general population converted at the same time, or the religion was adopted through a mixture of top-down and bottom-up processes.) | Metcalf 2002: 113-114 |
Use of force in conversion | Low (most communities adopted the new religion either voluntarily or due to pressure from other communities of the same culture) | Metcalf 2002: 31, 112-115 |
Adoption of a world religion | Present and predominant (At one time or another during the post-contact period, at least 75% of the indigenous population practiced a world religion.) | Metcalf 1982: 18; Metcalf 2002: 31 |
Resident missionary involvement in conversion process | Present, and from non-Austronesian societies (Resident foreign missionaries, at least one of whom was from a non-Austronesian society, played an important role in the conversion process.) | Metcalf 2002: 112 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Syncretic religious movements | Present, but did not survive to the present-day | Metcalf 2002: 31, 113, 142 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Replacement-level immigration | Medium (Replacement-level immigration occurred. The immigrant culture had a population size more than 50% of that of the indigenous population at one time or another, but this figure never exceeded 100%.) | Ghimire et al. (eds.) 1997: 110; Metcalf 1982: 13 |
Language shift | Medium (The indigenous language remained an important means of communication for the duration of the post-contact period, but at one time or another the indigenous population used a non-indigenous language to roughly the same extent.) | Eberhard et al. (eds.) 2020 |
Foreign government systems | Present, and of high importance (At one time or another during the post-contact period the culture was subject to a foreign government system that controlled most important decisions.) | Ghimire et al. (eds.) 1997: 110; Metcalf 2002: 25 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Changes in means of subsistence | Medium (Principal and major means of subsistence have changed from their indigenous states (e.g. through gain or loss of major and / or principal means of subsistence), but at least one of the major or principal means of subsistance has persisted.) | Metcalf 2002: 126-127 |
Exportation of goods to other cultures | Present and substantial (At one time or another during the post-contact period, exports were a primary focus of economic activity for over 10% of the population.) | Metcalf 1982: 16 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Vehicles and roads | Present and widely used (At one time or another during the post-contact period, motor vehicles were used by a substantial proportion of the population.) | Metcalf 2002: 127 |
Air travel | Absent (At no time during the post-contact period did most members of the culture have access to an airport or airstrip.) | Metcalf 2002: 109-137 |
Sea port | Present (At one time or another during the post-contact period most members of the culture had access to a sea port.) | Agency 2009: 164; Metcalf 2002: 27 |
Question | Response | Source |
---|---|---|
Loss of autonomy during postcontact period | High (On at least one occasion during the post-contact period, the culture came under the political dominance of a foreign power, and this event resulted in considerable loss of autonomy.) | Ghimire et al. (eds.) 1997: 110; Metcalf 2002 |
Nature of loss of autonomy – voluntary vs. forced | Largely involuntary (autonomy was lost largely as a result of external force) |